Jesus Was Probably Drunk When He Said He Was Coming Back – Vatican

[wp_ad_camp_4]
AFP_Getty-VATICAN-POPE-CONCLAVE_002[wp_ad_camp_1]

The spokesperson for the Vatican officially announced some days ago that the second coming of Jesus, the only son of the God, may not happen now after all, but urged followers to still continue with their faith, regardless of the news.

Cardinal Giorgio Salvadore told WWN that this years 1,981st anniversary is to be the Vatican’s last in regards to waiting for the Lord to return to Earth.
“We just feel Jesus is not coming back by the looks of it.” he said. “It’s been ages like. He’s probably flat out doing other really good things for people somewhere else.”
Nearly two thousand years ago, Jesus promised his disciples that he would come again in chapter John 14:1-3 of the bible: “There are many homes up where my Father lives, and I am going to prepare them for your coming. When everything is ready, then I will come and get you, so that you can always be with Me where I am. If this weren’t so, I would tell you plainly”

The Vatican defended Jesus’ broken promise, claiming “he was probably drinking wine” at the time when he made the comments.

“Having the ability to turn water into wine had its ups and its downs.” added Cardinal Salvadore. “We all make promises we can’t keep when we’re drunk. Jesus was no different.”The church said it will now focus attentions on rebuilding its reputation around the world, but will keep an optimistic mind for the savior’s second coming.
[wp_ad_camp_2]
[wp_ad_camp_3]

(PICZ) Pastor, Chris Okafor Beats And Tears Wife's Clothes, As Divorce Case Worsens
(PICZ) Young Lover Exposes Sugar Mum Pics Online (+18)

3 COMMENTS

  1. The Vatican is surely drunk, and if care is not taken he is probably one of the Anti-christ¤ the post he acquired is to confuse Christian of the coming of Lord Jesus Christ. Beware!!! Of fake doctrine, this is also sign of the End Time•

  2. The spokesperson for the Vatican is just a human susceptible to enormous human errors. I can’t believe that the spokesperson of the Vatican can refer to Jesus Christ was drunk. In first Peter 1 vs 19 it is stated clearly referring to Jesus Christ as unblemished, spotless lamb. On the other hand, if a clergy within the Christian community can refer to Jesus Christ as drunk then, I think that is misuse of language otherwise, that spokes man should be called to order and confess his sin. A drunk is not spotless. A drunk is alcoholic addicted to alcoholic drinks.

What Do You Think?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.